Interesting Facebook Debate Re Groundfighting
Check out this site and my comments lifted from a recent Facebook debate:
http://www.attackproof.com/the-myth-of-grappling-as-self-defense.html
My Comments:
To be honest mate I agree with a lot of this, the usual well-rehearsed stuff verging on stating the bleeding obvious such as try to avoid going to ground, no multiple attackers in the ring/cage, no weapons defences in MMA/BJJ etc but overall the tone was informed by the unnecessary feud in the USA between the Reality Systems and the MMA/BJJ camp. Take this as an example:
“A well known competitor (not in one of the legitimate judo, boxing, karate, kickboxing, or wrestling arts, but in this wonderful “system” that has been brought to us by the great masters from South America;land of machismo) starts a fight with someone!”
Petulant and with a bit of quasi-racism as well. Could this be motivated by the genuine and legitimate financial competition posed to Reality systems by MMA/BJJ? He uses bullshit terms like “Genuine Warrior” as well. Really, unless you are talking about Wishbone Ash albums from the 1970s, do not use the word “Warrior” ever.
Onto more substantial issues. Sometimes going to ground can be fine, e.g. if up against a bigger, stronger and younger guy an aggressive take down followed by a quick break or strike can be very handy. Most people don’t know how to fall so you can at least buy some time this way as he recovers from the impact of the fall. Weight advantage? our friend on these pages, Stephen Cole, is a big 20 stone muscular unit, I am a wiry 13 stone and getting on a bit: I’ll take my chances taking the guy down on my terms and ending up in the dominant position every time against trading toe-to toe with a gentleman that size who knows how to hit. And don’t rely on groin strikes: they don’t always work immediately and often you don’t have the room to get in a good kick. Against multiple attackers? You can effect aggressive takedowns which do not involve you going to ground and really screw the guy upwhen he hits the deck, not a bad option as it at least takes one guy out and buys some time.
You need to have a ground game to learn how to defend yourself on the floor, if anybody says all you need to do is bite, gouge, squeeze bollocks etc. then walk out of the class.
A good groundfighter will easily avoid and neutralise these defences, if you don’t believe me then try 2 minutes on the floor with my partner Leo Negao.
A lot of the Reality Systems teach basic defences on the floor but do not have a “Plan B” i.e. what to do if the guy knows what he is doing and defends your initial response. There are increasing numbers of accomplished groundfighters out there and not all of them are nice guys as Steiner suggests. (though some complete wankers do Reality systems as well, they are not all Genuine Warriors, or Wishbone Ash fans) and to counter them you need to know what their game is. This is also true of takedown defences: you need to known how to do a decent takedown before you can defend one properly in my view.
As Reality teachers we need to avoid people getting to wrapped up in the aesthetic of the groundfight so after being taken down we give guys 5 seconds to either tap out the aggressor or get up safely, if not they get a gentle toeing from the other guys in the group until they get up. Focuses the mind and teaches the right skills.
